Spoons calls it quits – What did we learn?

Many of its 44,000 Twitter followers were shocked at yesterday’s announcement that JD Wetherspoon will be closing all of its accounts across all social media platforms. The reasoning behind this bold decision however, remains relatively vague.

Wetherspoon’s CEO, Tim Martin, listed a few reasons why he’s calling it quits – one being trolling of MPs, another in relation to the news about personal data breaches. Fair enough. “I don’t believe that closing these accounts will affect our business whatsoever”, he said in a statement. He also explains that after consulting its pub managers, “90-to-95% felt using social media was not helping the business”.

Social media isn’t a one-size-fits-all kind of thing. It’s more useful to some businesses and less to others. Of course, any business can use social media, but some will get more out of it than others.

It’s an especially curious case with pubs. What used to be THE place to go to and socialise with people has been replaced by social media itself.  If you’re not savvy with your strategy, you’re practically wasting your time.

Managing 900 social accounts is undeniably a mammoth task, certainly not as easy as pie.  But how much did they really use social media? A look at their Twitter activity showed that until yesterday’s announcement they haven’t posted anything at all in April and before that roughly once a day, most commonly about something off their menu. And the same is seen on Facebook. Individual pubs’ Facebook and Twitter activity is even less enthusiastic. They were lacking strategy.

Getting off of social won’t change a lot for Wetherspoons, considering they haven’t really been doing much in the first place. But the impact could also be negative. Cutting themselves off means that they’ve lost their voice. Limiting their medium of communication to predominantly the pubs themselves could be costly. Many brands will know that using social media is a vital part of their customer service, and there’s a good reason for it. The lack of social presence could lead to the spread of negative opinions, ‘fake news’ and parody accounts with no brand representative to state otherwise.

A more sensible move would be to keep some of the accounts active and rethink their strategy to find something that works. Competitors will certainly make the most of the dropout.

Latest Posts

The hidden AI layer between your brand and your buyers Every marketer I speak to is talking about how they use AI. Very few are talking about the AI they cannot see. While we are all busy playing with tools and prompts, LinkedIn, Meta, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, X, Snapchat and…
Read More
Instagram has rolled out another exciting update, and this one is all about making Reels easier, smoother, and far more fun to create. Whether you use Reels for your business, personal brand, or simply to share moments with friends, these new camera improvements are designed to help…
Read More
How can CMOs stop Q4 paid social costs from spiralling? CMOs cannot change Q4 seasonality, but they can change how exposed they are to it. Instead of leaving all budget in live auctions when CPMs peak, use Meta’s Reservation buying to pre book key Q4 reach at fixed prices, then keep a smaller auction budget for agile tests and trading. Lock creative and plans earlier in the year, use Q2 and Q3 to find winning hooks and formats, and use AI to build CPM and ROAS scenarios. You turn Q4 from a chaotic bidding war into a planned portfolio with clear risk and upside.
Read More