Spoons calls it quits – What did we learn?

Many of its 44,000 Twitter followers were shocked at yesterday’s announcement that JD Wetherspoon will be closing all of its accounts across all social media platforms. The reasoning behind this bold decision however, remains relatively vague.

Wetherspoon’s CEO, Tim Martin, listed a few reasons why he’s calling it quits – one being trolling of MPs, another in relation to the news about personal data breaches. Fair enough. “I don’t believe that closing these accounts will affect our business whatsoever”, he said in a statement. He also explains that after consulting its pub managers, “90-to-95% felt using social media was not helping the business”.

Social media isn’t a one-size-fits-all kind of thing. It’s more useful to some businesses and less to others. Of course, any business can use social media, but some will get more out of it than others.

It’s an especially curious case with pubs. What used to be THE place to go to and socialise with people has been replaced by social media itself.  If you’re not savvy with your strategy, you’re practically wasting your time.

Managing 900 social accounts is undeniably a mammoth task, certainly not as easy as pie.  But how much did they really use social media? A look at their Twitter activity showed that until yesterday’s announcement they haven’t posted anything at all in April and before that roughly once a day, most commonly about something off their menu. And the same is seen on Facebook. Individual pubs’ Facebook and Twitter activity is even less enthusiastic. They were lacking strategy.

Getting off of social won’t change a lot for Wetherspoons, considering they haven’t really been doing much in the first place. But the impact could also be negative. Cutting themselves off means that they’ve lost their voice. Limiting their medium of communication to predominantly the pubs themselves could be costly. Many brands will know that using social media is a vital part of their customer service, and there’s a good reason for it. The lack of social presence could lead to the spread of negative opinions, ‘fake news’ and parody accounts with no brand representative to state otherwise.

A more sensible move would be to keep some of the accounts active and rethink their strategy to find something that works. Competitors will certainly make the most of the dropout.

Latest Posts

Yep – it’s a 101 for finding out if your B2B social campaigns and content are delivering. Think you know it all? Think again. The sands of marketing are shifting…again. Aligning metrics and business objectives. Most B2B marketers can tell you the engagement rate. And they certainly know the level…
Read More
Meta has started rolling ads into Threads timelines globally from late January 2026. That’s the moment Threads stops being a side app and becomes a paid, recommendation-led public square. Threads has passed 400 million monthly active users, and Meta has put daily actives at around 150 million. The strategic implication for B2C and B2B is the same; distribution gets easier to buy, credibility gets harder to earn. Threads rewards coherence in public conversation, how you answer, how you sound, how specific you are. Treat it as a trust surface, because that’s where decisions get shaped now.
Read More
Feeds are getting tired of “perfect”. A lot of the most interesting work going into 2026 is reacting against hyper-digital polish with visuals that feel more handled: scanned textures, mismatched elements, collecting layouts, and deliberate “imperfections” that make the human hand visible again. That matters for social, because audiences clock…
Read More