The dangers of Big Data and the biases of interpretation

Health services in South West London are in the process of being reconfigured. Which means the A&E department and maternity ward at my local hospital could soon close.

Residents have been told not to worry as it will only take 13 minutes to travel to the reallocated wards in Tooting.

How was the 13 minutes calculated? We aren’t told. Cut the data by traffic-dodging, siren-blazing ambulances and perhaps it is an accurate reflection. But does it factor in peak-time traffic? Does it accurately reflect the travel-time for visiting relatives or women in labour who have no sirens or means of dodging traffic?

The data has been cut to show what it needs to show and interpreted with underlying biases.

Which is why we should be welcoming Big Data with open arms and a healthy dose of critical thinking.

The risk of human bias in both the cutting and analysing of Big Data remains just as real – as does the danger of attributing cause to effect.

Take, for example, the Twitter and Foursquare data captured around Hurricane Sandy. In a recent article for Harvard Business Review, Kate Crawford, dissects a study into the real-world implications of social data. Crawford reveals that the data captured during Hurricane Sandy indicated a grocery shopping peak the night before the storm – no doubt people stocking up – with a peak in nightlife the night after – perhaps people letting off tension.

The data also indicated that Manhattan was at the centre of the disaster – with significantly more tweets about the storm coming from the city. What this data doesn’t factor in is the higher level of smartphone ownership or Twitter uptake in Manhattan, comparative with other, worse hit locations.  Or the impact that power blackouts, battery outages and limited phone access had on the ability for those worst hit to convey their experience of the storm on social media.

In short, data can and does often paint part of a picture. It’s up to the interpreter whether he chooses to accept that portrait as conclusive, or whether he continues searching for the bigger picture.

 

Latest Posts

Social Snapshot 22.10.25 banner, blue globe background, bold white title and date. Newsletter issue on long-form social video with platform specs, paid limits, YouTube TV viewing, TikTok Creator Rewards (>1-minute), Instagram 3-minute Reels, measurement and AEO tips
Read More
this post unpacks why b2b isn’t boring and how it’s moved from nice-to-have to mission-critical. it argues for trust as a working system (clear claims, named sources, human voices), puts short, sourced answers where people and ai look (linkedin, youtube, communities), and shows why people beat logos for credibility. it backs hybrid buying journeys that give control and timely human support, and it tracks intent signals like saves, sends and branded search. if b2b is your world, join us at socialday b2b forum 2025 at bounce, shoreditch on 12 november to go deeper.
Read More
If you’re a B2B marketer, you can probably see your buyer is changing. Your meetings seem to have more and more senior-positioned folk who are younger, digitally native, and social pioneers. It’s time to adapt accordingly. They research on their phones, trust creators more than brands, and expect to feel…
Read More