New restrictions for online content announced

David Cameron is set to announce today that internet providers will block pornography for every household in the UK – unless they actively opt-in to receive it. The Prime Minister will state that access to pornography is “corroding childhood” and further steps must be taken to stop it. Furthermore, search engines will be given until October to introduce additional measures to block illegal content.

Interestingly, earlier this month, Twitter quietly updated its iOS and Android mobile app to hide “sensitive material”, including nudity, violence or medical procedures, behind a warning label. This means it will be harder for users to accidentally encounter potentially distressing content whilst using the platform. Twitter’s update is also based on an opt out system – users have to actively change their settings to “view media that may contain sensitive content without a warning”.

Does this suggest a pattern of blocking potentially harmful content online unless the user pro-actively opts out?

Let’s take a look at another major social media platform: Facebook. Last month Facebook, after a sustained online campaign, announced it would remove ads from pages which contained controversial content – a move which would prevent adverts appearing next to offensive material beyond the advertisers’ control. Although Facebook already removes Pages and Groups containing illegal content, there have been calls from activists to improve its process for identifying and removing pages with sensitive content, specifically ones that glorify violence against women. Although Facebook has stated it takes dealing with offensive content “really, really seriously” it also suggests that the goal of their new procedure “won’t be as much content policing as there will be advertising policing”. As such, it seems Facebook is not considering an “opt out” system. Rather, removing ads from controversial pages means that activist groups may find it harder to get advertisers, and the media, to listen to their concerns.

So will social media be subject to further restrictions? Is Britain moving towards a system where users must actively opt-in to view sensitive material? Join the debate: leave a comment or tweet us @iftweeter

© AllThingsD  “Twitter screen” Photo. via The Next Web

Latest Posts

With B2B sales funnel focusses being so ABM orientated, how do marketing teams transfer this into social? Is LinkedIn the only answer? Maybe…but in some cases – maybe not. Firstly – let’s address the elephant in the room. It feels like there’s a real cost-pinch when it comes to marketing…
Read More
Social is scary enough: October’s frights that unlock Q4 growth I was going to write a Halloween screamer. But honestly, social is terrifying on a normal week, even when you’re not under pressure for Q4 growth. Algorithms lurch like zombies. AI keeps creeping around in corners. So, before I ham…
Read More
It seems Meta has done it again – taking inspiration from TikTok and adding another new feature to Instagram. This time, it’s something many of us have probably wished for: a Watch History tool. Late last week, Instagram’s boss, Adam Mosseri, announced that users will now be…
Read More