What are the repercussions of Facebook’s emotional contagion study?

July 1, 2014

Facebook has come under scrutiny recently over the ethical implications of a study conducted on its user base back in January 2012. The study manipulated over 689,000 user’s news feeds through fixing the sentiment of the content visible in their newsfeed and assessing the effects through “emotional contagion”.

The recent backlash does not question the scientific validity of the study, but more the deception of the platform’s users. The American Psychological Association assessed this issue in the detail around “informed consent”. It was found that nowhere in Facebook’s data use policy was the study of user information mentioned, meaning ethically the undertaking of the study was shady to say the least.

Robert Blackie, director of digital at Ogilvy One marketing agency. states that to avoid global media scandal in the future and even worse, loss of users, Facebook must:

“Have either independent reviewers of what they do or government regulation. If they don’t get the value exchange right then people will be reluctant to use their services, which is potentially a big business problem.”

As much as this is great advice for the future, it seems the backlash for this “slip-up” is already well underway. As the excerpts from user’s tweets show below, Facebook will have to really make this up to their users to get back any faith in their service.

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Name another service that conducts “A/B testing” by secretly filtering out communications my friends intend me to see. Go ahead, I’ll wait.[/dt_quote]

Erin Kissane (@kissane) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Controversy Over Facebook Emotional Manipulation Study Grows As Timeline Becomes More Clear https://t.co/CH85sDkEVo[/dt_quote]

Greg McNeal (@GregoryMcNeal) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Who knows what other research [Facebook] is doing?” https://t.co/X6qnmE2H2v[/dt_quote]

Matt Ford (@fordm) June 28, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]May be time to start looking for an alternative to Facebook……what else can they manipulate? https://t.co/JpOaZwQbYK[/dt_quote]

Rob Cerroni (@realretroguy) June 29, 2014

Images credits: Consumer Affairs, Brunch News

Latest Posts

Design and disability are so often discussed in terms of basic “accommodation” and “access,” yet my visit to the V&A’s Design and Disability exhibition completely shifted that perspective. Rather than framing disability as an issue to be fixed, the exhibition presents it as a culture, a rich set of identities, and a radical design force shaping practice from the 1940s right up to today.

Lurkers are your biggest audience and they’re deciding in silence. They watch in feeds, sanity-check you in comments, communities and reviews, then repeat whatever proof is easiest to quote internally. That’s why social feels harder, it’s no longer a click machine, it’s an answer surface. Ofcom shows AI summaries are now common in search results, and YouTube remains the UK’s biggest social utility by reach and time spent. If your story is inconsistent, your evidence is scattered, or your customer proof is buried, lurkers can’t do the job of trusting you for you.

Pinterest has rolled out a brand-new Media Planner inside its advertising tools, and it’s designed to make planning and managing Pin campaigns a whole lot simpler. In short? It gives you a clearer view of what you’re running, who you’re targeting, and what results you can expect…