The unfortunate impact of the new Twitter timeline

You may or may not have noticed, but your Twitter timeline has changed – it will no longer automatically show Tweets in chronological order. We know Twitter users don’t like change, and with a raft of changes announced in the past few months and weeks, including the furore around #Twitter10k, the drop in share price, and the Brand Enthusiast Gallery, scepticism is at an all time high.

But the latest update has riled more than just the everyday user. In updating the timeline, Tweets will be arranged based on relevancy, rather than only chronology, at the top of your timeline. London’s transport provider TfL seemingly immediately threw its toys out of the pram, with an announcement of their own – causing yet more outcry.

TfL explained that it will change how frequently it will post to its Twitter accounts, and the types of content it will post, in response to the introduction of the algorithmic timeline. The travel service was concerned that only “high impact and important updates would be likely to reach customers” who activate the tweet-selecting algorithm. In response, they announced how their content would change:

“Now selected content on Twitter is shown out of sequence, we will reduce the amount of minor alerts and focus on providing up-to-the-minute alerts for major issues, as well as a renewed focus on customer service across our various accounts.”

Although that decision now seems to have been rescinded, with a TfL spokesman issuing the following statement:

“We are not making any immediate changes to the current range of information we post on Twitter, which means customers will continue to receive real-time travel updates.

“Social media platforms are continually changing and we will continue to work in partnership with them to ensure we provide our customers with the information that they need.”

What seemed to be the problem in this particular case was a lack of communication on Twitter’s part – there was no proper explanation that non-chronological timelines were optional, and that there is a very easy way of making sure that nothing changes.

So a complete U-turn then, and good news for commuters in London. But this whole episode has wider implications for both Twitter and for brands. If Twitter continues to announce changes without listening to users, the current air of discontent will only increase.

And if this spreads to brands and advertisers (a large part of Twitter’s income) in the way that it seems to be, Twitter really is in big trouble.

All it needs is more communication from Twitter, more consultation with and listening to users rather than the current focus on short-term financial gain.

Latest Posts

B2B leads go cold when interest is captured before the buying group is ready to move. A form fill shows that someone acted, but it does not mean the decision is ready. Social keeps the commercial conversation alive by carrying proof, building trust and showing what buyers are researching before sales can see it.
Read More
Creative content on social media tends to fall into two camps: the stuff you actually remember, and the stuff you clicked on once… then instantly forgot. We’ve all experienced the second one. The extra dramatic hooks, the “OMG, this will TOTALLY change your life” claims, the slightly over-the-top thumbnails. It’s…
Read More
FMCG brands don’t need more hacks. They need to understand the behaviour behind the feed. This is my particular bugbear right now. The algorithm is only useful when you understand the people behind the signals.  We get endless tips about timing, hooks, formats, posting frequency and “what the algorithm wants”,…
Read More