Our Facebook accounts are outliving us – what happens to Facebook after death?

There are currently an estimated 30 million Facebook accounts that belong to people who have passed away, raising the unnerving question: what happens to those abandoned profiles after death?

For many people, grieving through social media can be a very comforting experience – allowing them to connect with friends and gain support, without having to painfully endure a face-to-face interaction. Since 2009, Facebook have offered family members the opportunity to memorialise an account, allowing family and friends the chance to post condolences, and share past memories with other grieving Facebook members.

For others however, the world of social can be considered a painful and constant reminder of what has been taken away from them. The experience of revisiting and reliving the past by scrolling through Facebook Timeline can be too difficult to bear. In cases like this, it is possible to start a petition and have the Facebook profile deactivated, removing all traces of the accounts existence.

Despite the options available, the one thing that Facebook is unable to offer grieving families is the login details to their loved one’s account. Facebook’s strict privacy policy prevents them from revealing this kind of information to anyone other than the account holder. Is Facebook therefore letting some family members down?

I recently read an article about a young teenage boy who had committed suicide, leaving his family devastated, and his parents desperately seeking answers. Since their son had changed his Facebook password in the days before his untimely death, it was clear that access to his Facebook account could give the family insight into what drove him to commit such an act of desperation.

After a long legal battle it took this family over a year to be granted limited access to their son’s account. Note carefully the word limited. In such extenuating circumstances, is it fair to conclude that this privacy policy is simply unethical and somewhat heartless? Is it time for this legislation to be revisited?

Image courtesy of Marcopako, facebook logo, under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic license

Latest Posts

B2B marketing feels slower because you’re selling to a buying group, not a decision maker. Forrester says the average buying decision involves 13 people and 89% of purchases involve two or more departments. Add three generations with different trust cues and you get rework, internal debate, and “one more version” forever. Buyers are also doing more research without sales, which makes guessing expensive. This LinkedIn Live with Tejal Patel is about buyer behaviour, trust cues, and what social is doing in research and validation, so you can build one narrative that travels across the group and saves your team time.
Read More
We’re only a couple of weeks into 2026, and social already feels…different, in the best way possible. This year isn’t just about flashy new features or the next viral sound; it’s about making the internet feel more human, more useful, and a lot less exhausting.
Read More
Buyers are hunting answers, and social is deciding who they trust The short answer Mahoosive behaviour change for customers is already here. Search is being replaced by an answer layer, and social is feeding it. When Google’s AI Overviews show up, people click less, sessions end sooner, and your carefully-crafted…
Read More