What are the repercussions of Facebook’s emotional contagion study?

Facebook has come under scrutiny recently over the ethical implications of a study conducted on its user base back in January 2012. The study manipulated over 689,000 user’s news feeds through fixing the sentiment of the content visible in their newsfeed and assessing the effects through “emotional contagion”.

The recent backlash does not question the scientific validity of the study, but more the deception of the platform’s users. The American Psychological Association assessed this issue in the detail around “informed consent”. It was found that nowhere in Facebook’s data use policy was the study of user information mentioned, meaning ethically the undertaking of the study was shady to say the least.

Robert Blackie, director of digital at Ogilvy One marketing agency. states that to avoid global media scandal in the future and even worse, loss of users, Facebook must:

“Have either independent reviewers of what they do or government regulation. If they don’t get the value exchange right then people will be reluctant to use their services, which is potentially a big business problem.”

As much as this is great advice for the future, it seems the backlash for this “slip-up” is already well underway. As the excerpts from user’s tweets show below, Facebook will have to really make this up to their users to get back any faith in their service.

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Name another service that conducts “A/B testing” by secretly filtering out communications my friends intend me to see. Go ahead, I’ll wait.[/dt_quote]

Erin Kissane (@kissane) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Controversy Over Facebook Emotional Manipulation Study Grows As Timeline Becomes More Clear https://t.co/CH85sDkEVo[/dt_quote]

Greg McNeal (@GregoryMcNeal) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Who knows what other research [Facebook] is doing?” https://t.co/X6qnmE2H2v[/dt_quote]

Matt Ford (@fordm) June 28, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]May be time to start looking for an alternative to Facebook……what else can they manipulate? https://t.co/JpOaZwQbYK[/dt_quote]

Rob Cerroni (@realretroguy) June 29, 2014

Images credits: Consumer Affairs, Brunch News

Latest Posts

Open your feed today and you’ll probably scroll past dozens of AI-generated images and videos. Some are clever, some are beautiful, and some are just off. AI can be both a time-saver and a trust-breaker. Used well, it accelerates creativity. Used carelessly, it can make campaigns feel soulless and detached…
Read More
Social Snapshot 22.10.25 banner, blue globe background, bold white title and date. Newsletter issue on long-form social video with platform specs, paid limits, YouTube TV viewing, TikTok Creator Rewards (>1-minute), Instagram 3-minute Reels, measurement and AEO tips
Read More
this post unpacks why b2b isn’t boring and how it’s moved from nice-to-have to mission-critical. it argues for trust as a working system (clear claims, named sources, human voices), puts short, sourced answers where people and ai look (linkedin, youtube, communities), and shows why people beat logos for credibility. it backs hybrid buying journeys that give control and timely human support, and it tracks intent signals like saves, sends and branded search. if b2b is your world, join us at socialday b2b forum 2025 at bounce, shoreditch on 12 november to go deeper.
Read More