A game-changer or just another hurdle?

Meta’s Twitter clone, Threads, is testing a new feature that would let users replicate their X (formerly Twitter) follows on the platform. Sounds useful, right? Well, not so fast—the process isn’t exactly seamless.

According to app researcher Alessandro Paluzzi, Threads’ “Creators from X” tool will require users to manually download their X follow list, then upload it to Threads to find matching accounts. In theory, this helps users rebuild their X communities without endless searching. In practice? It feels like a missed opportunity for something much simpler.

Let’s break down what this means, and whether it actually matters.

A smart move but not a seamless one

Threads’ biggest challenge has always been user retention. The app saw huge initial sign-ups but struggled to keep people engaged long-term. By offering an easier way to bring over existing X connections, Meta is playing the long game, trying to remove one of the biggest friction points for new users: rebuilding their network.

However, the manual process is a problem. Social media users thrive on convenience, and any extra steps (especially downloading and re-uploading data) will likely result in low adoption rates. If Meta really wants to pull X users over, a one-click import option would be far more effective.

Will X users actually make the switch?

There’s been a lot of noise about people leaving X, especially due to its shift in leadership and policy changes. And yet, despite all the controversy, X’s daily active user count remains at 250 million, the same as when Elon Musk took over in 2022.

If people haven’t left X by now, will this feature be the final push they need? Unlikely. Most users who wanted to switch probably already have. The bigger challenge for Threads isn’t getting X users to join—it’s keeping them engaged with content and communities that feel just as active and valuable as X.

Content over convenience

The success of Threads won’t be determined by how easy it is to follow the same people from X. What will make or break the platform is whether people actually want to spend time there.

Right now, X still dominates real-time conversation and news, while Threads leans toward lifestyle, culture, and softer discourse. For Threads to truly challenge X, it needs to carve out a stronger identity beyond being the “nice Twitter.”

If I were Meta, I’d be focusing less on importing follows from a rival app and more on:

Improving in-app discovery – making it easier to find relevant content, trending conversations, and niche communities.

Enhancing creator tools – giving users better monetisation, content visibility, and engagement analytics.

Leaning into what makes Threads unique – Instead of mimicking X, Threads should double down on what differentiates it (integrations with Instagram, multimedia content, a less toxic discourse).

This follow import feature is a nice-to-have, not a must-have. While it might help some users transition more smoothly, it won’t be the thing that convinces people to ditch X for Threads permanently.

A small step, but not a game-changer

Threads’ real challenge isn’t onboarding – it’s creating a compelling enough experience to keep people engaged. Until that happens, no amount of follow-importing will shift the balance of power between these two platforms.

Would you use this feature, or do you think Threads should be focusing elsewhere? Let’s discuss – contact us today.

Latest Posts

Yep – it’s a 101 for finding out if your B2B social campaigns and content are delivering. Think you know it all? Think again. The sands of marketing are shifting…again. Aligning metrics and business objectives. Most B2B marketers can tell you the engagement rate. And they certainly know the level…
Read More
Meta has started rolling ads into Threads timelines globally from late January 2026. That’s the moment Threads stops being a side app and becomes a paid, recommendation-led public square. Threads has passed 400 million monthly active users, and Meta has put daily actives at around 150 million. The strategic implication for B2C and B2B is the same; distribution gets easier to buy, credibility gets harder to earn. Threads rewards coherence in public conversation, how you answer, how you sound, how specific you are. Treat it as a trust surface, because that’s where decisions get shaped now.
Read More
Feeds are getting tired of “perfect”. A lot of the most interesting work going into 2026 is reacting against hyper-digital polish with visuals that feel more handled: scanned textures, mismatched elements, collecting layouts, and deliberate “imperfections” that make the human hand visible again. That matters for social, because audiences clock…
Read More