Need for Speed

Apps have revolutionised speed-reading through displaying single words in rapid succession. These apps are based on a method known as Rapid Serial Visual Presentation, or RSVP. It’s nothing new and has been documented in cognitive psychology since the early 1970s, but with the rise of mobile and apps, its popularity has rocketed.

When you read normally, your eyes jump (“saccade”) from word to word, usually at about 200-250 words per minute. With RSVP, there is no need for saccades because each word is displayed, one at a time, centred on the screen, for a fixed duration (Matthew J. Traxler 2011)

Don’t believe me? Try it for yourself

Honda has used this technique in a truly creative campaign, consisting of one TV advert and a 40-second, 30-second, and a 20-second ad. The text displayed in each ad got quicker in correlation to its duration, with the 20 second ad’s text displaying at a much faster rate than the 40 second ad. Sadly this campaign was stopped in the UK as it breached advertising regulations.

Coincidently, another East Asian car manufacturer Hyundai had previously also used this technique during a campaign promoting the Sonata Turbo. Hyundai teamed up with Spritz (a speed reading app) to produce a landing page that allowed customers to see how fast they could read the provided copy, prompting them to share their results via social.

hyundia pic 1

Having said all this, a study published back in April 2014 in Psychological Science suggests there is a downside to using this technique in advertising. The study claims that moving your eyes between words helps you better understand what you have read. Readers typically move their eyes in the direction that text is written. And around 10% – 15% of the time readers look back at words they have already read, according to previously published research. The new study suggests that comprehension, recall, and retention suffer when readers are prevented from looking back at what they have previously read. So should we just forget using speed-readers in marketing?

The simple answer is no. When Honda challenged viewers on TV to go onto YouTube to see how fast they could read, the results where staggering – the campaign gained over half a million views in the first two days.

When used in the right context this technique can prove to be effective, and with the average amount of time consumers staying tuned to ad videos being less 10 seconds (Clickz) the need to get to get your message across as quickly as possible is important.

Latest Posts

Design and disability are so often discussed in terms of basic “accommodation” and “access,” yet my visit to the V&A’s Design and Disability exhibition completely shifted that perspective. Rather than framing disability as an issue to be fixed, the exhibition presents it as a culture, a rich set of identities, and a radical design force shaping practice from the 1940s right up to today.
Read More
Lurkers are your biggest audience and they’re deciding in silence. They watch in feeds, sanity-check you in comments, communities and reviews, then repeat whatever proof is easiest to quote internally. That’s why social feels harder, it’s no longer a click machine, it’s an answer surface. Ofcom shows AI summaries are now common in search results, and YouTube remains the UK’s biggest social utility by reach and time spent. If your story is inconsistent, your evidence is scattered, or your customer proof is buried, lurkers can’t do the job of trusting you for you.
Read More
Pinterest has rolled out a brand-new Media Planner inside its advertising tools, and it’s designed to make planning and managing Pin campaigns a whole lot simpler. In short? It gives you a clearer view of what you’re running, who you’re targeting, and what results you can expect…
Read More