So, what was all the fuss about?

Musk’s takeover of twitter enraged, engaged and enthused many – but after threats of boycotts and major brands taking a step back, twitter is still alive and – for now – well. What have we learned, if anything, from this? And should brands be making a return in earnest?

The layoffs were bad – the sudden nature of them – the unexplained purpose of them. That was what riled many. Musk’s reputation before joining twitter was marmite, but if anything, we’ve just seen an example of riding out the storm still reaps rewards.

Crawling back

We saw (temporary) boycotts from major brands, who refused to run paid ads and post on the platform – Apple being one such company. But this positioning from major corporations was testing the water. Musk’s daily musings – odd at times – kept people on the platform for sheer intrigue alone – and thus remained the foundation for advertising.

As the old adage goes; ‘be where the people are’. And people were – and still are – on twitter. In the millions.

Months after Musk’s takeover – and after countless posts from ex-employees explaining how badly their dismissal process actually was – the initial PR battle for stepping back and ‘taking a stand’ had all brands looking across at one another waiting for one to make the first move to take a step back into the water. The consumer/customer pool party was still alive and kicking after all.

 The fear of missed opportunity – a competitor getting gains ahead of your own – is probably what has led to many brands returning to twitter. But, for how long?

Trouble on the horizon

For all the attendance on the platform, outages remain prominent, advertising revenues continue to drop, and after another round of job cuts – twitter employees just 2,000 people (they had a 7,500-strong workforce just four months ago).

This recent Financial Times article further explains how the future looks somewhat bleak for the platform – this was predicted following Musk’s original takeover. We also touched on how developments back in December  would prove a real test for twitter in early 2023 – this appears to be bearing fruit.

But – despite all the bad news and doom predictions – there are still millions of users on the platform. It may be that its reputation and integrity is in question, but while there is an audience to play to, will the show just go on?


If you’re unsure on how to take your next steps on/off twitter – contact us.

Latest Posts

B2B marketing feels slower because you’re selling to a buying group, not a decision maker. Forrester says the average buying decision involves 13 people and 89% of purchases involve two or more departments. Add three generations with different trust cues and you get rework, internal debate, and “one more version” forever. Buyers are also doing more research without sales, which makes guessing expensive. This LinkedIn Live with Tejal Patel is about buyer behaviour, trust cues, and what social is doing in research and validation, so you can build one narrative that travels across the group and saves your team time.
Read More
We’re only a couple of weeks into 2026, and social already feels…different, in the best way possible. This year isn’t just about flashy new features or the next viral sound; it’s about making the internet feel more human, more useful, and a lot less exhausting.
Read More
Buyers are hunting answers, and social is deciding who they trust The short answer Mahoosive behaviour change for customers is already here. Search is being replaced by an answer layer, and social is feeding it. When Google’s AI Overviews show up, people click less, sessions end sooner, and your carefully-crafted…
Read More