The Anatomy of a Crisis Part One: Storm in a Twittercup

Listening to the recent Webinar: How to effectively manage a social media crisis it struck me how readily the term “crisis” is applied to just about anything that can negatively impact a brand on social media. From Twitter hackings to disgruntled employees hijacking a company Twitter, everything is labelled a crisis. However, a real social media crisis will do more than cause a flurry of tweets. It will impact not only a company’s reputation, but customer trust in a brand and, ultimately, have a significant financial impact.

Is it easy for those involved in social media to think events are a crisis? This three part series will look at social media “crises” and what really constitutes reputational and financial damage.

The recent HMV Twitter embarrassing incident caused a flurry of commentary, including our own! But was it really a crisis? Did it significantly damage the brand? Or impact a business already in administration?

If we take a look at a simple timeline of social media mentions around HMV over the course of January and February 2013 a clear spike in activity can be seen. However, if you look closer this isn’t surrounding the social media incident at all, but instead the administration announcement and confusion over gift vouchers.

The number of mentions surrounding this purely on line social media crisis (#hmvxfactorfiring) barely form a blip compared the chatter surrounding the “real life” news of HMV calling in the administrators. Key words showed heavier mentions of topics relating to HMV falling into administration and original decision not to accept gift vouchers compared to key words around the social media crisis.

This isn’t to say that the social media incident was not important. But was it a crisis? Probably not: an issue the company may have handled differently, but not a full blown crisis.

Why was this not a crisis? Well, for starters, it had no lasting impact – people stopped talking about Poppy Powers (the perpetrator of the live firing tweets on the HMV account) and her #hmvxfactorfiring in less than a day. Certainly it didn’t cause any lasting financial, reputational or trust issues for the company: the cornerstones of a true crisis. In fact, in this instance, it was completely overshadowed by “real life” events, namely HMV going into administration, and completely ignored by mainstream news. In fact, the entire storm barely spread outside of Twitter!

Perhaps we have to be careful not to view every incident entirely through a social lens. An incident doesn’t necessarily make a crisis and shouldn’t be blown out of proportion.

Look out for part two: When a social media crisis really does impact reputation.

Latest Posts

Social is increasingly about how content feels to the person on the other end (AKA Mood-based marketing). When you show up with a steady atmosphere (calm, confidence, small sparks of joy) people stick around and come back. And you can measure it properly: saves, meaningful comments, watch-time through key beats,…
Read More
Meta, the company behind Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, has announced a range of new advertising features during its annual Brand Building Summit. These updates are designed to give advertisers more ways to promote their products and services, particularly across Reels and Threads, as well as more control…
Read More
B2B marketing success in 2025 depends on trust, not just reach. Buyers use social to research, value authentic video, and trust thought leadership more than ads. This roadmap shows how to build belief with content mixes, creators, and social proof—because trust is the KPI that drives growth.
Read More