The Social Media Generation Game is here but there ain’t no Brucie Bonus, in fact who’s ‘Brucie’?

The ever dividing gap of age generation is now so evident within the digital sphere of social media. With statistics evident of teens turning from Facebook or Twitter it’s safe to ask what the social media platforms are they turning to have or don’t have. The inevitable digital rebellion against their ‘parents’ before them is beginning to take place through new forms of content interaction and a diversification in the way new content is owned and shared.

Snapchat recently turned down Billions from the ‘Grand-daddies’ of digital being Facebook and Google but was this a shortcoming in the financial offer? At offers exceeding $2 Billion we think not, but a simple look at the interactive nature and ownership of the platform we can see the ethos is almost opposable to that of the bidding parties.

Here’s how the opinions of certain elders vs. youngsters of each platform commonly weigh up

‘Teacher vs Student: How Each Actually Uses Social Media’ By Katie Lepi on https://www.weareteachers.com/ October , 2013

Snapchat users are pretty much encouraged to post in more extreme ways; being the ‘ugly face’ or a potential risk of worse. However users can only see messages from approved contacts lists and can delete contacts at any time. A platform of choice for those who appeal with content to be seen once and forever lost. Whereas Facebook actively looks to preserve, log and populate a timeline that spans as far back as our digital content, or sheer effort, allows us to go.

Google, in an even more integrated approach, sees to cross platform its users’ search and activity data to connect the world through unfathomable algorithmic commonalities and more recently, Google plus users being given the ability to email any other user. A potentially problematic situation driven by a wonderfully utopian ideal.

The gap between the generations’ social media interactivity has yet to be properly defined, we are still in the pre renaissance of a potentially complex digital age. With the access to social media and handset access reaching younger ages all the time, the risks continue to grow and so do the number of platforms.

So is the platform of  ‘widely shared content’ and ‘more likes more views” (baby pics included) seeing a change? Or have we simply jumped to the extreme in revolt against our baby booming parents? Have we simply shifted from the first generation of social media ‘share with the many’ users and developed a second generation that is extremely more selective and simply prefer to ‘share with the few’. Whichever, we can be sure we ‘may’ not be seeing Bruce Forsyth asking “What’s on the board Miss Ford?” on Snapchat any time soon. (God I feel old)

 Image Credit: Digital Native at  https://bit.ly/1byGjTd Rights Reserved https://bit.ly/workout13

Latest Posts

D2C has a channel problem Why platform roles and better creative are replacing the old channel plan Direct to consumer brands don’t need more social channels in the plan. What’s needed is a clearer ‘platform stack’ (sorry not being nerdy, but this is the best term I can think of!).
Read More
Snapchat for B2B. No, we’re not joking – and no, we won’t apologise for the poor joke attempt in the title. The US platform says that it is the ‘new destination for B2B marketing’. A bold statement. But is it backed up by data? Well – sort of. But also…
Read More
AI promised time back. It lied If you’ve switched AI on and somehow feel busier, you’re not imagining it. You’re now managing a tool, training it, checking it, and explaining it to everyone else. The day job still exists. That’s why we ran our “Thank fck, practical AI for marketers”…
Read More