What are the repercussions of Facebook’s emotional contagion study?

Facebook has come under scrutiny recently over the ethical implications of a study conducted on its user base back in January 2012. The study manipulated over 689,000 user’s news feeds through fixing the sentiment of the content visible in their newsfeed and assessing the effects through “emotional contagion”.

The recent backlash does not question the scientific validity of the study, but more the deception of the platform’s users. The American Psychological Association assessed this issue in the detail around “informed consent”. It was found that nowhere in Facebook’s data use policy was the study of user information mentioned, meaning ethically the undertaking of the study was shady to say the least.

Robert Blackie, director of digital at Ogilvy One marketing agency. states that to avoid global media scandal in the future and even worse, loss of users, Facebook must:

“Have either independent reviewers of what they do or government regulation. If they don’t get the value exchange right then people will be reluctant to use their services, which is potentially a big business problem.”

As much as this is great advice for the future, it seems the backlash for this “slip-up” is already well underway. As the excerpts from user’s tweets show below, Facebook will have to really make this up to their users to get back any faith in their service.

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Name another service that conducts “A/B testing” by secretly filtering out communications my friends intend me to see. Go ahead, I’ll wait.[/dt_quote]

Erin Kissane (@kissane) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Controversy Over Facebook Emotional Manipulation Study Grows As Timeline Becomes More Clear https://t.co/CH85sDkEVo[/dt_quote]

Greg McNeal (@GregoryMcNeal) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Who knows what other research [Facebook] is doing?” https://t.co/X6qnmE2H2v[/dt_quote]

Matt Ford (@fordm) June 28, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]May be time to start looking for an alternative to Facebook……what else can they manipulate? https://t.co/JpOaZwQbYK[/dt_quote]

Rob Cerroni (@realretroguy) June 29, 2014

Images credits: Consumer Affairs, Brunch News

Latest Posts

B2B leads go cold when interest is captured before the buying group is ready to move. A form fill shows that someone acted, but it does not mean the decision is ready. Social keeps the commercial conversation alive by carrying proof, building trust and showing what buyers are researching before sales can see it.
Read More
Creative content on social media tends to fall into two camps: the stuff you actually remember, and the stuff you clicked on once… then instantly forgot. We’ve all experienced the second one. The extra dramatic hooks, the “OMG, this will TOTALLY change your life” claims, the slightly over-the-top thumbnails. It’s…
Read More
FMCG brands don’t need more hacks. They need to understand the behaviour behind the feed. This is my particular bugbear right now. The algorithm is only useful when you understand the people behind the signals.  We get endless tips about timing, hooks, formats, posting frequency and “what the algorithm wants”,…
Read More