What are the repercussions of Facebook’s emotional contagion study?

Facebook has come under scrutiny recently over the ethical implications of a study conducted on its user base back in January 2012. The study manipulated over 689,000 user’s news feeds through fixing the sentiment of the content visible in their newsfeed and assessing the effects through “emotional contagion”.

The recent backlash does not question the scientific validity of the study, but more the deception of the platform’s users. The American Psychological Association assessed this issue in the detail around “informed consent”. It was found that nowhere in Facebook’s data use policy was the study of user information mentioned, meaning ethically the undertaking of the study was shady to say the least.

Robert Blackie, director of digital at Ogilvy One marketing agency. states that to avoid global media scandal in the future and even worse, loss of users, Facebook must:

“Have either independent reviewers of what they do or government regulation. If they don’t get the value exchange right then people will be reluctant to use their services, which is potentially a big business problem.”

As much as this is great advice for the future, it seems the backlash for this “slip-up” is already well underway. As the excerpts from user’s tweets show below, Facebook will have to really make this up to their users to get back any faith in their service.

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Name another service that conducts “A/B testing” by secretly filtering out communications my friends intend me to see. Go ahead, I’ll wait.[/dt_quote]

Erin Kissane (@kissane) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Controversy Over Facebook Emotional Manipulation Study Grows As Timeline Becomes More Clear https://t.co/CH85sDkEVo[/dt_quote]

Greg McNeal (@GregoryMcNeal) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Who knows what other research [Facebook] is doing?” https://t.co/X6qnmE2H2v[/dt_quote]

Matt Ford (@fordm) June 28, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]May be time to start looking for an alternative to Facebook……what else can they manipulate? https://t.co/JpOaZwQbYK[/dt_quote]

Rob Cerroni (@realretroguy) June 29, 2014

Images credits: Consumer Affairs, Brunch News

Latest Posts

The era of UGC driving rumbles on – with LinkedIn now saying that content generated by individual profiles is proving more effective for B2B lead/sales generation than business pages. Yes, people buy from people so we can understand this logic. We’re more likely to engage with a personal post than…
Read More
You know what’s oddly cheering. Most brands have loads of proof that they’re worth buying. By proof I mean the specifics that make a claim believable when someone repeats it to a friend, or a colleague, or their partner on the sofa. Customer stories with detail. Before-and-after that feels properly…
Read More
If you work in social media, staying informed isn’t optional. It’s part of the job. Trends, platform changes, cultural moments, crises, memes, conversations, they all shape what we publish and how it’s received. Being aware of what’s happening in the world helps us create content that’s relevant, sensitive, and credible.
Read More