What are the repercussions of Facebook’s emotional contagion study?

Facebook has come under scrutiny recently over the ethical implications of a study conducted on its user base back in January 2012. The study manipulated over 689,000 user’s news feeds through fixing the sentiment of the content visible in their newsfeed and assessing the effects through “emotional contagion”.

The recent backlash does not question the scientific validity of the study, but more the deception of the platform’s users. The American Psychological Association assessed this issue in the detail around “informed consent”. It was found that nowhere in Facebook’s data use policy was the study of user information mentioned, meaning ethically the undertaking of the study was shady to say the least.

Robert Blackie, director of digital at Ogilvy One marketing agency. states that to avoid global media scandal in the future and even worse, loss of users, Facebook must:

“Have either independent reviewers of what they do or government regulation. If they don’t get the value exchange right then people will be reluctant to use their services, which is potentially a big business problem.”

As much as this is great advice for the future, it seems the backlash for this “slip-up” is already well underway. As the excerpts from user’s tweets show below, Facebook will have to really make this up to their users to get back any faith in their service.

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Name another service that conducts “A/B testing” by secretly filtering out communications my friends intend me to see. Go ahead, I’ll wait.[/dt_quote]

Erin Kissane (@kissane) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Controversy Over Facebook Emotional Manipulation Study Grows As Timeline Becomes More Clear https://t.co/CH85sDkEVo[/dt_quote]

Greg McNeal (@GregoryMcNeal) July 1, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]Who knows what other research [Facebook] is doing?” https://t.co/X6qnmE2H2v[/dt_quote]

Matt Ford (@fordm) June 28, 2014

[dt_quote type=”blockquote” font_size=”normal” animation=”none” background=”plain”]May be time to start looking for an alternative to Facebook……what else can they manipulate? https://t.co/JpOaZwQbYK[/dt_quote]

Rob Cerroni (@realretroguy) June 29, 2014

Images credits: Consumer Affairs, Brunch News

Latest Posts

Yep – it’s a 101 for finding out if your B2B social campaigns and content are delivering. Think you know it all? Think again. The sands of marketing are shifting…again. Aligning metrics and business objectives. Most B2B marketers can tell you the engagement rate. And they certainly know the level…
Read More
Meta has started rolling ads into Threads timelines globally from late January 2026. That’s the moment Threads stops being a side app and becomes a paid, recommendation-led public square. Threads has passed 400 million monthly active users, and Meta has put daily actives at around 150 million. The strategic implication for B2C and B2B is the same; distribution gets easier to buy, credibility gets harder to earn. Threads rewards coherence in public conversation, how you answer, how you sound, how specific you are. Treat it as a trust surface, because that’s where decisions get shaped now.
Read More
Feeds are getting tired of “perfect”. A lot of the most interesting work going into 2026 is reacting against hyper-digital polish with visuals that feel more handled: scanned textures, mismatched elements, collecting layouts, and deliberate “imperfections” that make the human hand visible again. That matters for social, because audiences clock…
Read More