New restrictions for online content announced

July 22, 2013

David Cameron is set to announce today that internet providers will block pornography for every household in the UK – unless they actively opt-in to receive it. The Prime Minister will state that access to pornography is “corroding childhood” and further steps must be taken to stop it. Furthermore, search engines will be given until October to introduce additional measures to block illegal content.

Interestingly, earlier this month, Twitter quietly updated its iOS and Android mobile app to hide “sensitive material”, including nudity, violence or medical procedures, behind a warning label. This means it will be harder for users to accidentally encounter potentially distressing content whilst using the platform. Twitter’s update is also based on an opt out system – users have to actively change their settings to “view media that may contain sensitive content without a warning”.

Does this suggest a pattern of blocking potentially harmful content online unless the user pro-actively opts out?

Let’s take a look at another major social media platform: Facebook. Last month Facebook, after a sustained online campaign, announced it would remove ads from pages which contained controversial content – a move which would prevent adverts appearing next to offensive material beyond the advertisers’ control. Although Facebook already removes Pages and Groups containing illegal content, there have been calls from activists to improve its process for identifying and removing pages with sensitive content, specifically ones that glorify violence against women. Although Facebook has stated it takes dealing with offensive content “really, really seriously” it also suggests that the goal of their new procedure “won’t be as much content policing as there will be advertising policing”. As such, it seems Facebook is not considering an “opt out” system. Rather, removing ads from controversial pages means that activist groups may find it harder to get advertisers, and the media, to listen to their concerns.

So will social media be subject to further restrictions? Is Britain moving towards a system where users must actively opt-in to view sensitive material? Join the debate: leave a comment or tweet us @iftweeter

Latest Posts

D2C has a channel problem Why platform roles and better creative are replacing the old channel plan Direct to consumer brands don’t need more social channels in the plan. What’s needed is a clearer ‘platform stack’ (sorry not being nerdy, but this is the best term I can think of!).

Snapchat for B2B. No, we’re not joking – and no, we won’t apologise for the poor joke attempt in the title. The US platform says that it is the ‘new destination for B2B marketing’. A bold statement. But is it backed up by data? Well – sort of. But also…

AI promised time back. It lied If you’ve switched AI on and somehow feel busier, you’re not imagining it. You’re now managing a tool, training it, checking it, and explaining it to everyone else. The day job still exists. That’s why we ran our “Thank fck, practical AI for marketers”…